Get Connected

KCAMP's monthly newsletter

Home

May

July

Your Source For Current Information and Trend Developments

September 2007

_______________________________

 

Different Dress Codes for Men and Women?

As a general rule, the answer is yes, as long as those differences reflect current social norms. Below you will find out what the courts have said about this issue and get tips on implementing a dress code. When an employer's dress code differentiates between male and female employees, the charge often is made that a gender specific requirement constitutes sex discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act (Title VII). However, generally, the courts do not require that both sexes must follow the exact same rules. Instead, they hold only that both sexes, when in similar situations, should be held to the same general standard. As an example, you might say that all office employees with customer contact (regardless of sex) must present a well-groomed, professional appearance.

It is a well-settled principle of law that dress requirements that reflect current social norms typically have been upheld, even when they affect only one sex. Also, in the same vein, policies prohibiting male employees from wearing earrings, but allowing women to wear them, generally have been upheld. For example, the court in Kleinsorge v. Eyeland Corp., found that minor differences in personal appearance codes that reflect customary modes of grooming do not constitute sex discrimination.

Therefore, the employer's request that a male employee not wear earrings, when female employees were allowed to so, did not violate Title VII. Men generally have not been successful in claiming discrimination when policies restrict long hair for them only. In fact, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) typically does not pursue such charges. For example, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals, in Harper v. Blockbuster Entertainment, 139 F.3d 1385 (11th Cir.), cert. denied 525 U.S. 1000 (1998), acknowledged the EEOC's position and found that the employer's policy prohibiting long hair for male employees did not violate Title VII.

Dress codes that have no basis in social customs, that differentiate significantly between men and women, or that impose a greater burden on women usually are not upheld. As a practical matter, you actually have a lot of leeway in what you can require your employees to wear in the workplace. Bottom line, if a dress code is established for business reasons and applied uniformly, it generally will not violate employees' civil rights, even if it has different standards for men and women.

That said, your dress code should not differentiate between men and women without good reason. To prevent legal claims, you should reflect current social norms, business needs, and safety requirements. And finally, you should make sure you explain as best you can the underlying rationale for your policy to employees. They may not like your position any better, but at least they will know your intent and purpose.


Announcements & Reminders…


Frequently Asked Questions From Our Members

 

Deep Thought: If you work on a lobster boat, sneaking up behind people and pinching them is probably a joke that get’s old real fast.

 


Top

Home